Everyone involved with measurement technology knows the somewhat flippant ? but very catchy ? statement: ?In the event that you measure a whole lot, you measure nothing!? What is meant by that is: You can measure a lot. However the values are only useful if you can validate them. In everyday life, for example, you can be surprised once the scales in the home show a large deviation from those at the doctor?s or the bicycle speedometer deviates many hundreds of metres from the GPS instrument. Triple alludes to your tendency to generate a lot more data inside our modern world, without thinking about its evaluation. As a way to obtain valid data with which to continue working, it really is worthwhile for industrial measuring instruments to be calibrated regularly.
For the individual, the best accuracy will not be important. In industrial applications, however, it is precisely this that can make the key difference between rejects and the highest quality ? hence the calibration of the measuring instruments. It serves to match the measuring device with the national standard ? in a nutshell: to check whether the values are correct.
Traceability to the national standard
The keyword here’s thus the traceability to the national standard. Realizing that the respective measuring instrument measures the proper value could be of great importance for many applications. For instance, ISO 9000 requires that the deviations of the test equipment used ought to be monitored. Having an up-to-date calibration, passing the audit is not any problem. This avoids the repetition of the audit, production downtime or perhaps a recall ? and therefore reduces stress, time and costs. The expenditure on the calibration has thus quickly covered itself. Everyone is happy.
Besides meeting the audit requirements, traceability may also be necessary for quality assurance, optimising resource utilisation and reducing energy consumption. Finally, probably the most convincing reason to have one?s own measuring devices checked in accordance with the current standard is the feeling of security: The measuring instruments will continue to provide the correct values!
Certification in accordance with the German accreditation body
The illustration shows the way the four calibration sequences in accordance with DKD-R 3-3 differ.
The highest standard because of this is the calibration certificate of the German accreditation body (Deutsche Akkreditierungsstelle ? DAkkS). WIKA has offered certification for pressure, temperature and electrical measurands (DC current, DC voltage and DC resistance) for quite a while. Since the beginning of 2022, tecsis has been accredited relative to DIN EN ISO / IEC 17025 for the measurand force.
Just what a DAkkS-certified calibration of force measuring instruments means is shown by the example of high-end force transducers, which are employed in calibration machines. In their case, the test sequence follows the EN ISO 376 standard. At the very least eight measuring stages are approached, with a total of five preloads, two upward series and two up-down series. Furthermore, the force transducers are each rotated by 120�, which results in three installation positions. With 65 measured values (eight stages), your time and effort is correspondingly high. The purchase price for this type of calibration goes hand in hand with this.
Regarding industrial devices, the question arises as to whether this type of procedure is worthwhile. Alternatively, the DKD-R 3-3 directive could be applied. It describes four test sequences which can be selected good requirements. WIKA and tecsis also have DAkkS certification for this.
A further option for regular calibration is the non-standardised 3.1 inspection certificate.
Practical examples
An illustrative exemplory case of the usefulness of regular calibration may be the checking of hydraulic compression force transducers. These instruments measure the clamping forces of industrial machines such as for example punches, pneumatic presses, sealing presses, spindle presses, tablet presses and toggle lever presses. Here, calibration provides a contribution to ensuring safe working conditions.
Another example may be the instrumentation for checking the contact forces of welding tongs. Ideally, these are monitored continuously by built-in tension/compression force transducers, however they may also be checked at set intervals utilizing a test set for measuring electrode forces (model FSK01). This ensures the caliber of the welding points and reduces wear on the electrodes.
For the tension/compression force transducers mentioned, calibration is also worthwhile, should they be used for monitoring very precise production steps. When pressing in cellular phone displays, for example, both measuring instruments and their calibration can quickly pay back: If an error in that process is not noticed immediately (for instance, only if the travel is controlled), several thousand euros in material value could be destroyed within minutes.
Adjustment before calibration can be useful
Depending on instrument, application and regulation, it may be worthwhile to have an adjustment carried out before calibration. In this way, the user means that their measuring instrument achieves the corresponding accuracy during calibration. For the calibration itself, the user gets the option of choosing the sort and procedure, both for the own and for third-party products.
Note
On the WIKA website you will find further information on the average person calibration services as well as on WIKA force measuring instruments (offers are also available in the online shop). When you have any questions, your contact will gladly assist you to.
Also read our post
Calibration or adjustment ? Where?s the difference?