A Canadian Supreme Court justice has resigned from his place following allegations of misconduct, in accordance with the Canadian Justice Council. Justice Russel Brown was accused of being involved in a drunken altercation at an Arizona resort in January, the place he allegedly harassed a female visitor. Endorsed , who has denied the allegations, has been on leave since February. The retirement concludes the Canadian Justice Council’s investigation into the alleged misconduct.
The incident in query took place at the luxury Omni Scottsdale Resort & Spa at Montelucia while Brown, 57 years old, was attending a gala celebrating a former colleague. A police report filed in January acknowledged that a US Marine Corps veteran claimed Brown touched a feminine visitor with out consent and was subsequently punched “a few times” during an argument. Jonathan Crump, a 31-year-old mortgage adviser and US Army veteran, informed The Vancouver Sun that Brown harassed his feminine good friend after meeting him within the resort bar late on January 28.
Following the publication of the story, Brown released a statement in response to what he called “false statements within the media by Mr Jonathan Crump.” He confirmed parts of Crump’s account, stating that he joined the group on the table but “did not communicate or in any other case engage with him.” The Canadian Justice Council introduced in March that it was reviewing a criticism into Brown’s alleged conduct.
On Monday, the Canadian Justice Council said that since Brown was now not a judge, its jurisdiction over the criticism in opposition to him had ended. “As such, proceedings earlier than the Council that involve Justice Brown have come to an end,” it said.
Brown’s lawyer, Brian Gover, shared an announcement from the decide on Monday, saying the allegations have been “false” and he had “hoped this concern would be allotted shortly and wouldn’t considerably influence the Court’s business,” however that has not been the case. The statement from Brown continued, “While my counsel and I are assured that the complaint would have finally been dismissed, the persevering with delay is in nobody’s interests – the Court’s, the public’s, my family’s or my very own.”