An escalating spat over alleged sexual molestation at a massage parlour in Chiang Mai‘s Wualai district has taken a brand new twist. The accused masseuse, along with the owner of the establishment, retaliated, filing a police complaint against the younger male shopper and the creator of the Facebook submit that spurred the preliminary allegation. They claim the online account was a distortion of the actual occasions, causing injury to their business popularity.
On July 7, a post appeared on Facebook stating that a younger man had been sexually assaulted by a transgender masseuse whereas availing of a conventional Thai massage. The consumer, in accordance with the submit, took offence and responded by kicking the masseuse within the face. The submit claimed the massage proprietor had refused to simply accept accountability, as an alternative advising the complainant to report the matter to the police.
The report hinged mainly on the accusation of molestation as the massage parlour lacked CCTV cameras to offer concrete proof. In addition, the supposed victim had sought damage compensation amounting to 1,000 baht (US$28). Following a media report, the incident garnered important public attention.
Addressing the situation at present, the 38 yr old masseuse Piphat and the spa proprietor offered themselves to the Chiang Mai City Police investigators. They lodged a report in opposition to the web page proprietor and the younger man behind the disputed Facebook story, claiming that it distorted the truth, resulting in loss and injury to their popularity, reported KhaoSod.
Piphat denied the molestation allegations, explaining that the shopper had come in for an oil therapeutic massage together with his girlfriend ready behind a separating curtain. Around 30 minutes into the session, the shopper suddenly attacked Piphat, accusing him of inappropriate behaviour, and thereafter demanding compensation of 1,000 baht. Piphat and the parlour proprietor refused to compensate as they have been convinced of no wrongdoing on their half.
The parties later met at the police station to determine facts and talk about a possible settlement. While the purported sufferer confessions about assaulting Piphat have been obvious, no evidence of recent harassment was presented. Consequently, the events agreed to settle the assault matter with a compensation of 1,000 baht and an apology. However, Blacklisted proceeded to unfold distorted info on social media, contradicting their previous settlement.
Piphat, with over six years of impeccable service in the masseuse career, vehemently denied any misconduct claims. Their preliminary seek the guidance of with police advised transferring ahead with charges of physical harm given the opponent’s refusal to merely accept liability regardless of being at fault. They were also contemplating filing extra complaints for continuous popularity damages..